Truth about Modi

 A person's mindset reflects in his misadventures. His tendency to present a particular event in a form which will instigate hatred when all he is expected to do is relay the event as an ethical journalist is exposed. So now you say doubting the integrity of journalists is wrong. I think there are a few anti Modi websites spewing venom and hurling brickbats when the judiciary has cleared Modi.

They say Modi cannot be cleared of the charges since he ordered carnage in Gujrat in particular the murder of ex MP Mr. Ehsan Jaffri.

Zakia Jaffri, wife of Mr. Ehsan Jaffri, changed her claims regularly in Aug 2003 in front of the Nanavati Commission and an Apex court in Sept 2003. In Sept 2003, she filed an affidavit but did not level allegations against Modi. In the words of SIT, ""It was for the first time in June 6, 2006, after a lapse of four years, that she came up with the said complaint. The allegations in the complaint are vague, general and stereotyped." Also, , here is the SIT report on Ehsan Jaffri's death. On Modi invoking Newton's law of 'action and reaction'
"In his interview the CM has clearly referred to Jafri's firing (on the mob gathered at his house) as 'action' and the massacre as 'reaction'. It may be clarified here that in case late Ehsaan Jafri, fired at the mob, this could be an immediate provocation to the mob, which had assembled there to take revenge of Godhra incidents from Muslims."

The SIT has said that even if Mr Modi had told the police during the riots to allow the Hindus to vent their anger over the massacre of 56 kar sevaks in the Godhra train burning incident, the mere statement of those in the confines of a room does not constitute an offence. On this, the SIT seems to have based its report on public statements made by Mr Modi during the riots.

"Interpretations made on alleged illegal instructions given by the Chief Minister by RB Shreekumar and Sanjiv Bhatt, appear to be without any basis. Further, even if such allegations are believed for the sake of argument, mere statement of alleged words in the four walls of a room does not constitute any offence," says the report by the SIT, headed by RK Raghavan.